All posts by Gertrude

Unknown's avatar

About Gertrude

I am a little left of centre 21st Century person. What all that means you'll discover as you read my blog!

The IPCMC is a move in the right direction

Uncategorized

It is very heartening to know that the government is taking the setting up of the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) seriously. Although present and past members of the police force have expressed their opposition to it, Home Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin has stated that the government will go ahead with the plan.

There are conciliatory moves to allay the fears of the cops with Muhyiddin saying that the police force’s concerns will be considered. Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has also agreed to meet the policemen to hear their views.

Frankly, I don’t know why the cops are making a big deal of the IPCMC. Apparently, the existing Police Commission has failed to ensure the discipline of the police force. So, we hear of cops bribing, shooting because they were shot at first (seriously? Who believes that!), numerous deaths in police custody and the latest unheard of abuse of power — the “disappearance” of citizens!

There have been a few cases when policemen involved in such abuse of power were taken to court but it has done nothing to stop or even reduce the incidences of such police excesses.

A commission with more teeth is needed to ensure fair disciplinary action and investigations of the police force. The IPCMC fits the bill. An independent commission will ensure impartiality in judgement and send a strong message to the police force that the excesses of the past will no longer be tolerated and, therefore, never repeated. There cannot be another “abduction” of citizens by “agents of the state” as concluded by the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) in its findings on the “enforced disappearances” of Pastor Raymond Koh and activist Amri Che Mat.

The IPCMC will keep the police on their toes. The police force has for too long been left “unsupervised”. Understandably, they might feel chagrined to have their wings clipped with an oversight body. But, it is only for the immediate interim period. Once they get used to the new culture of doing their job according to the rule of law, the police will not be manipulated by powerful vested interests against whom they might be powerless but to comply. The IPCMC will be an independent force under whose watchful eye policemen will be expected to do their job for the public good.

There really are many good cops but the actions of a few seem to have great public implications and they need to be dealt with publicly to regain the trust of the people in the police force.

I hope more and more Malaysians express their support to the setting up of the IPCMC. It’s a good decision by the government and moving the police force in the right direction.

 

Mischief-makers upend the rule of law

Uncategorized, ,

Of all the current crop of leaders in the country, there is only one from my vantage point as a well-informed citizen I see as having no vested interest. And that is the Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. His only vested interest is the good of the nation. Period.

That is not to say that other leaders are not concerned over the good of the nation. They are but many have vested interests and when these come in conflict with the greater good, the human tendency is to protect your interests. But, Tun has none. He has nothing to lose. And that is why he can be trusted.

Like he said, he is a man in a hurry who wants to establish good conventions of governance so that the leaders who follow him abide by the rule of law and have no reason to seek the help of those with vested interests to wheel and deal to stay in power, like the  previous Najib government did.

Wheeling and dealing can take place with associates as long as no law is broken. But, if you are a public official there can be no monetary deals involving public funds. Even if commissions are involved in the tender of government projects, the amount must be clearly specified and the full amount should go into the government coffers and not into anyone’s pocket. Better still, there should be no commission for government tenders!

But, the culture that was openly nurtured under the previous Umno government was to “you help me and I help you and we have a win-win situation where we can also help our supporters by throwing some morsels in their direction in the form of BR1M and such” under the guise of in the name of “race, religion and rulers”. When leaders quote the latter cliched slogan, you know that’s what they mean.

Under Tun’s premiership under the Pakatan Harapan (PH) government that culture has been put paid. But disgruntled Umno leaders still think they can elicit the help of vested interests to topple a rightfully elected government and Tun is fully aware of what they are up to and identified the culprits in the current Johor-Putrajaya issue by telling them: “You lost, be quiet!”

Neither Tun nor the PH Cabinet has in any way slighted the rulers. But, some people apparently poked fire and started this rift between the Johor royalty and the federal government. Notice, how quiet they are now, hiding somewhere quietly like mice while others suffer from the fallout? They should just get a job, then they won’t have time for making mischief!

Rulers generally don’t interfere with the running of the state unless approached. Ill-advised and irresponsible politicians who do that would then put them in a spot. Tun fully knows what is going on and he has made it very clear that rulers can’t interfere in the administration of the country and the state. There can’t be two rules or a joint rule.

This is the rule of law that must be respected because that is what the Federal Constitution — the supreme law of the land — states. Rulers and politicians and citizens know what the law says. Much has been written on it and it is public knowledge. Constitutional expert Datuk Dr Shad Saleem Faruqi, who is a professor with University Malaya, has stated again and again that rulers endorse what the executive decides on.

Tun is the elder statesman. He knows what he is saying. More importantly, he is laying the ground rules for future leaders so that no elected leader will be influenced by vested interests. The rule must be by the people for the people.

The issue isn’t ignorance of the law; it is compliance. If everyone without exception follows the rule of law, there will be political stability. That will eventually lead to economic progress for all, and in our case, it may come sooner rather than later — if the rule of law is upheld by all.

Good Friday to Christ’s resurrection

Uncategorized, , , ,

Today is Good Friday, the day Jesus Christ died on the cross. Worldwide Christians will hold services to remember His death and the events that led to it. We don’t celebrate Good Friday; we remember it reverently not because it glorifies death but because it points to the powerful reality of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

When Jesus Christ died by crucifixion, his disciples were shattered. In shock, they stood around not knowing what to make of what was happening. This was the “Son of God” as he claimed to be but right before their eyes, he was beaten to a pulp and now hanging on the cross! The Son of God dead!

What the disciples felt was probably much like what many Christians experienced when they saw the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, France burning. It must have shaken their faith to see the cathedral in flames. They may have felt anguish, disappointment, fear, anger, hopelessness.

But, three days after Jesus’ death, something happened that was even more incredulous! Jesus Christ rose from the dead and appeared to them in bodily form. Hundreds of people saw and touched him after he rose again. And, again, they were confused, lacking in understanding until the day of Pentecost when the Holy Spirit descended on them and then they understood — that death was necessary so that Christ could rise again. He is alive.

Christ’s resurrection is the fundamental basis of the Christian life. It affirms our humanity that we will suffer and feel all that mortality brings to us but, through faith in Christ, we will have access to divine power to help us live to the fullest despite all our humanness.

A video, titled “Where was God when Notre Dame burned” is making the rounds in which a Catholic priest gives the answer. His explanation is precisely what Good Friday and the Resurrection is all about and I would like to paraphrase it here.

He says people would get emotional seeing the cathedral burning and especially seeing the tall spire topple down. But he draws attention to the fact that the crucifix in the church remained intact and that was a symbol of hope, that God is everywhere helping us along. Meaning that the materials and the building can burn but the real message of the church is hope and that will never die.

The priest calls on Christians not to be in despair over the burning of the church but to take the hope that the cross points to — that is eternally alive because Christ lives — and rise above the negative feelings.

That is what Christianity is all about — applying that resurrected power by faith to the circumstances of our lives and living life to the fullest!

So, this Good Friday, don’t be mournful! Some Christians get very emotional and go to great lengths to relive the sorrows that Christ may have felt when he carried his cross. But the truth is that the pain inflicted on him was no more than was inflicted on others who also died on the cross. Crucifixion was the punishment for criminals of that time. And, Jesus died like a common criminal as predicted by the ancient scriptures.

People sometimes find rational explanations difficult to digest and prefer the emotional connection. Such people will wear ashes over them and walk around in sackcloth or flagellate themselves or carry crosses like Jesus, none of which is mentioned in the Bible that we must do to follow him! They go overboard on showing the pain of Christ, but it is not necessary.

The cross is a powerful Christian symbol of the hope it opened up for us. Good Friday makes no sense without the resurrection. And, that is why we remember Good Friday but celebrate the resurrection. Death was necessary for divine life to enter the human realm. We live that out.

Easter, by the way, is an ancient pagan festival celebrating the arrival of spring, which is often associated with the concept of rebirth. By the eighth century, Anglo-Saxon Christians began adopting the name to designate the celebration of Christ’s resurrection, which also signifies rebirth into a new life.

Wishing you a blessed Easter!

 

 

 

Three issues of importance

Uncategorized

It’s a pity that the case of the “enforced disappearance” of two Malaysian citizens has been overshadowed by equally important issues such as the Rome Statute ratification, the Johor-Putrajaya tensions and the amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution.

No doubt Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has said that a new investigation will be launched after the current Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Mohamad Fuzi Harun, who was the head of Special Branch when Pastor Raymond Koh and activist Amri Che Mat were abducted, steps down next month.

Suhakam (Human Rights Commission of Malaysia) implicated “state agents”, particularly the Special Branch, for carrying out the abductions which the commission has labelled as “enforced disappearances”.

The investigation based on Suhakam’s findings after its 18-month public enquiry is a much-welcomed relief! With other issues taking centre stage now, it is hoped that there would be no further delay in launching the investigation in finding out who was or were behind the “enforced disappearances”.

This is an urgent issue as it involves two lives. Malaysians want immediate answers to still unanswered questions. First and foremost is the question: Are they still alive? If they are, they should be released to their respective families.

Then, we want to know who gave the directive for the abductions and on what grounds? Was it Mohamad Fuzi? Did he make the decision based on reports filed by his staff? How did they get the information on these two men? Were they tipped off and if so by whom? Or, were vested interests involved and those vested interests prodded Mohamad Fuzi or somebody else in Special Branch to act?

Frankly, these questions and many more can be immediately answered if the Home Minister will just call up Mohamad Fuzi to explain and then provide all the answers at a press conference. If that isn’t feasible, then, there is no choice but to wait for an official investigation, which must take place immediately.

This is not an issue that can wait until an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) is set up. It has to be resolved immediately because leaving it unaddressed is, in fact, closing an eye to state-sponsored abductions or terrorism. That is totally unacceptable!

Reach out to opposition MPs

I mentioned in my first paragraph the Rome Statute ratification, the Johor-Putrajaya tensions and the amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution. Much has been written on them and I won’t go into the details as these issues are extensively covered in the media.

I wonder though if the real issue is not the laws but the lack of engagement between Putrajaya and vested interests. Unfortunately, where the rulers are concerned, engagement can only occur within the confines of the law. The running of the country and the state are only undertaken by elected officials. That needs to be respected because it is the will of the people. Deferring to the rulers only takes place as the law allows it.

A lack of engagement, perhaps, was the reason why the Pakatan Harapan government failed to get a two-thirds majority to pass the amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution to give Sabah and Sarawak an equal footing with Peninsular Malaysia in accordance with the spirit of Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).

It would be good for the Pakatan Harapan (PH) government to take note of what the opposition Members of Parliament (MPs) are saying. They are not against the bill. They abstained. Some said it was because of PH’s arrogance, others because it lacked sincerity and Putrajaya failed to engage the Sabah and Sarawak state assemblies.

PH was only 10 short of 148 votes of the 222 seats in the Dewan Rakyat to make a two-thirds majority. If PH does not have a two-thirds majority in the Dewan Rakyat, it should start engaging lawmakers in the opposition to support important bills such as the amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution.

PH lawmakers, perhaps, should reach out to opposition MPs and present to them a rational case based on facts and figures to clear whatever suspicions they may have of the government initiative. The power of conviction of the benefits of the bill should be enough to convert enough opposition MPs to give a two-thirds majority.

The bill may be presented again at a later date. Hopefully, PH would work hard to deliver a victory to the people of Sabah and Sarawak then.

 

Race baiting comes at a price

Uncategorized, ,

Political leaders who resort to demonizing other races for political advantage may not realise that their actions will hurt the very people whose support they are seeking.

Umno politicians used race to win over the majority Malay voters in the Seminyeh by-election by referring to non-Malays as pendatang and penumpang (immigrants and riders) among other things and incensing the non-Malays in the process. Politicians have always used the race card to win support. No doubt that has been the practice, especially in the rural areas, but it was a practice that non-Malays never appreciated.

They put up with it because the non-Malay partners of the previous Barisan Nasional administration were apparently advised (privately, never openly) that it was a necessary strategy to get the Malay rural vote so that Umno had the Malay mandate to lead the BN coalition.

Well, that was before. Now, Pakatan Harapan is in government with the strong support of non-Malays who wholeheartedly demonstrated their patriotism when they staked their claim as equal partners in this country by overwhelmingly supporting the PH in the 14th General Election (GE14).

To have had to listen to the racial drivel that was poured out at the Seminyeh by-election and which was followed up by others was an assault and insult to the loyalty of the non-Malays to Malaysia.

Leaders and the politically knowledgeable may understand the need for such a strategy if it would mean support from the homogenous rural voter base. That support would have meant that the candidate and party they supported would lead the government, which in turn would have ensured the interests of this particularly large demographic.

In Seminyeh, however, would that strategy have helped Umno deliver? Umno is now the opposition. Can it meet the needs of the rural Malay voter which only the government of the day can deliver? They can’t. So, what was the primary objective of using the race card if not to stay in power by any means?

Once the voters realise that race baiting was used only to win an election, they are going to wise up to Umno’s bankrupt political patronage as they finally realise that race politics was nothing but a pack of lies.

Do Umno politicians understand the damage they cause by resorting to race baiting? People in the know may understand it was nothing but a strategy; the politicians are actually not racist. The grassroots, however, don’t know that — they might now, after all the publicity the issue attracted.

As long as the grassroots don’t know they were taken for a ride, the consequence is a dangerous enmity between the races. The mentality of us vs the others will be entrenched and that would be the end of racial unity.

Do they know what they are doing? To use the language of Umno leader Khairy Jamaluddin in the hope his colleagues understand, “do you comprehend, YBs (Yang Berhormat (respected Members of Parliament))?”

Despite using the race card, politicians of different races generally work together for the sake of political expediency. But, it is a different scenario on the ground. The chances for social integration will be diminished. Because of the race divide, the races will continue to live in their social ghettos, maintaining cordiality for the sake of peace but deeply wary of each other.

Social integration won’t take place, which means economic integration won’t follow. Businesses and markets will be characterised by race and remain segregated. People of different races won’t form businesses together and reach out to a mixed market. Markets will be confined to and restricted by race. How can they grow businesses in limited markets?

In the absence of an integrated economy, it becomes easier for capital owners to uproot and get out if their interests are threatened, which may lead to an economic collapse.

There is only one way to prevent such a catastrophe from ever happening. Integrate the economy so that businesses and markets are encouraged and supported across the races. The solution is not to reinstate the 30% bumiputra shareholding quota in listed companies as considered by the Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad but to launch policies and plans for multi-racial businesses and companies where possible.

In this respect, MCA president Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong’s suggestion to the government should be considered. He had asked the government to give tax incentives for savings and shareholdings, and educate students on investment and shares through school syllabuses and extracurricular activities.

Government policies must aim at social and economic integration. That would make it clear that all Malaysians are treated as equals and will be supported in their endeavours to make Malaysia a better home and none will have any reason to flee.

A new journey begins …

Uncategorized

TurkeyJet

Thanks for joining me!

I’ve called this blog 21stcenturycitizen because that’s who all of us are. By being in this century, here or anywhere on Earth, we are connected in one way or another. No matter how different we are, by virtue of simply belonging to this century, there will be something about each other we can relate with or reach out to. That is what I would like to affirm in this blog.

Our differences may separate and divide us but our commonness can unite and strengthen us as a community and that hopefully is what I would like to achieve through this blog.

So, I’ll be writing about anything and everything but all will have a modern, progressive outlook. I am not one who is pigeon-holed into a stereotype so sometimes I may write something that may not fit into your scheme of things. Bear with me! An occasional jolt hurts no one! It might bring us back to the truth of reality!

I think more people will be able to relate to this blog, so I am looking forward to an interactive comments section.

I’ll upload my post every Friday.